Skip to main content

Important Stuff, Truly Must-See



I mentioned a few days ago that the most compelling part of the Jan 6 committee hearings so far for me has been the description of the particulars of how the breach of the Capitol complex happened. The story is usually presented as something like this. There was a big group of angry and potentially violent Trumpers. There was a much smaller group, maybe as few as a few dozens of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers with a more focused ideology, a clearer plan of the insurrection and so forth. They were both more eager to get violent and had a lot more experience getting violent. But they were in the extreme minority of the people up there. So even though they're now the ones facing serious charges including seditious conspiracy they are only a small part of what happened.

See Also: Pelosi defends not passing a bill, claims Supreme Court Justices aren't in any danger despite assassination attempt this week…

The committee did a good job of explaining that that's not at all what happened. In fact, these two groups were acting as the command and control directing the mob, actually using paramilitary drill and planning to direct the crowd, punch through vulnerable entrance points and so forth and then have the larger mob follow them. I've followed this pretty closely and even I still had the sense that the progression of events that day, in terms of the escalation of violence was more organic. That's wrong. The Proud Boys especially were basically directing the events.

See Also:  Whoopi Goldberg says 'both sides' guilty of rhetoric like Schumer's against Kavanaugh, must 'be more careful'

The committee largely just asserted this. They had some details and I think a few maps. But mostly within the confines of a hearing they were just asserting it: this is what we learned from our investigation. Perhaps in a latter hearing they'll go into more detail. Yesterday I noticed this video assembled by The New York Times. It's really must see work. They pull together a trove of different videos, break them down to show the role of different Proud Boy leaders and soldiers and then weave these together with court documents from the on-going cases against the various insurrectionists. It tells the story above in powerful and convincing detail.

See Also: Texas Rep Jasmine Crockett blamed Republicans for shooting: 'The blood of these children' is on their hands

In fact, it shows an additional point I hadn't understood. The mechanics of the breakthrough into the Capitol have been explained either as poor preparation by the Capitol Police or the individual heroism of Capitol Police officers. So it's either a negligent failure or an heroic one. But this reconstruction of events shows something a bit different. At several points the attempted breakthroughs failed. The defenders were able to reinforce their positions, bring in more personnel in riot gear, etc. At those points, the Proud Boys leaders directing the assaults drew back from the attack points to where they could see the whole complex more clearly. They reevaluated and chose another entry point to attack. They then issued orders to had picked members of their team to refocus on other more vulnerable entry points. It's very much a military operation.

See Also: CNN media analyst on Kimmel interview: Biden could use 'exposure' that isn't 'too challenging' for him

As I said, this wasn't just an angry mob overwhelming outnumbered defenders. There was a lot more command and control than that. And that command and control was coming from the Proud Boys. The Proud Boys and Oath Keepers collaborated in their planning and both groups bought caches of weapons and so forth. But at least from the Times reconstruction what I'm describing here was mostly the Proud Boys.

 See Also: CNN correspondent Whitney Wild downplayed the violent threat against Justice Brett Kavanaugh's life and warned about political violence from both sides, after an armed man was arrested outside the justice's home, Wednesday.  

Here's the link to the Times video. As I said, it's really something you must watch.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best Links for Education Powerful Backlinks

http://blogger.psu.edu/ http://blogs.berkeley.edu/ http://statemuseum.arizona.edu/ http://blog.uwgb.edu/ http://gsc.mit.edu/blog/ http://www.career.umkc.edu/ http://blogpublic.lib.msu.edu/ http://www.dmu.edu/blog/ http://www.amcollege.edu/ http://aar.slu.edu/ http://abroadblogs.newpaltz.edu/ http://aceop.wvstateu.edu/ http://blog.admissions.cornell.edu/ http://admissions.fsu.edu/ http://admissions.ncsu.edu/ http://aearu.ntu.edu.tw/ http://ag.arizona.edu/ http://aipi.clas.asu.edu/ http://aiti.mit.edu/blog/ http://alg.umbc.edu/usaq/ http://alumni.brandeis.edu/ http://alumni.gsb.stanford.edu/ http://tomprofblog.mit.edu/ http://answer.rutgers.edu/blog/ http://antarctica.uab.edu/blog/ http://aphia.rso.siuc.edu/ http://appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/ http://apps.exploratorium.edu/ http://apps.pathology.jhu.edu/ http://archery.berkeley.edu/ http://architecture.tulane.edu/ http://asiahealthpolicy.stanford.edu/ http://asic.union.edu/ http://asunews.asu.edu/ http://www.rioredstorm.com/ http://atif

Learn more about our updated Terms of Service

robert77fer@gmail.com We're updating our Terms of Service on May 22, 2024, so we wanted to let you know ahead of time. These changes won't affect the way you use our services , but they should help make it easier for you to understand what to expect from Google — and what we expect from you — as you use our services. You can see the new terms here . We also summarized the changes at the bottom of this email. What do I need to do? If you're under the age required to manage your own Google Account : We sent this email to your parent or guardian so that they can help you understand our updates better. Please discuss this email with your parent or guardian to decide if you need to do anything different with your account. If you're a parent or guardian, and you allow your child to use the services: Please review the updates to our terms with your child and help them decide whether they need to make a

Kraken Exchange Bitcoins To Bank Cryptocurrency To you

Tether (USDT) chips are dumped into a portfolio-controlled address by the Cracow Stock Exchange, one of the few places where a stable problem can be converted into the US dollar. The portfolio's stock market capitalization stood at US $ 47.8 million at the time of writing, making it the eighth most expensive portfolio of these assets, according to the stock exchange list. In contrast to this situation with less than two weeks, on October 7, when the Kraken portfolio was located in a much lower place, ranked 22nd, and kept less than half of its current balance: 21.6 million USDT. Archived versions of the rich list show that the portfolio balance fluctuates between $ 10 and $ 24 million between the end of December 2017 and the beginning of October. In other words, the current balance represents a marked non-qualitative value. Some market observers have suggested that this means that traders want to change USDT against the dollar. Kraken is one of the few exchanges that offers direct